Attending the Ride of Silence did get me thinking ... I'm not so sure I'm in tune with it. I think the format has a number of problems and contradictions, but here are my initial thoughts in a nutshell:
- The ride portrays cyclists as victims
- The emphasis on deaths and serious injuries does not encourage people to take up cycling
- The activity does not encourage any interest from local or national media
- It does nothing to advance the cause of cycling either as a healthy and safe activity or a useful utility
I'd prefer, and I think those tragically killed and injured on the road would prefer, a celebration of cycling which promoted the personal, economic and environmental benefits of cycling; which campaigned for facilities for cyclists - safe junctions, secure bicycle parking at work, at the mall, safe bicycle access to community facilities like schools and hospitals.
Improvements like this would truly serve as a fitting memorial ...
Okay ... end of rant ;-)